Members don't see the ad below. Register now!

More intellectual property fun as it relates to online courses:

Sparring over ownership of course materials might grow, as more institutions offer online courses and look at them as a potential source of revenue. Experts feel that the law is uncertain when it comes to statutes and case law, and an argument could be made for either side.

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/03/14/former-asu-professors-threatens-litigation-over-online-course-ownership

asked 14 Mar '12, 16:42

robrambusch's gravatar image

robrambusch ♦
23.3k120135

Members don't see the ad. Register now!

Who owns the recordings? Where the recordings made using campus equipment? There's more to this case than what was explained. And what of those who apply for a National Teaching Credential? They have to make 2 recordings as a requirement. What if their work is being used other than to obtain a Credential? I'm going to go micro wave some popcorn, this is going to get nasty to watch.

link

answered 14 Mar '12, 18:06

insaneuser's gravatar image

insaneuser
461

The comments to the article had some analysis. Based on the descriptions of the relevant agreements it seems both sides can make a case.
(15 Mar '12, 00:36) rseiter ♦ rseiter's gravatar image
1
My experience with crafting legal software has allowed me to hear the personal insights from attorneys. If I understand correctly, the issues that will be presented should be very interesting to reflect upon for Educators that wish to follow the same path as the MacSwan's.
(15 Mar '12, 12:24) insaneuser insaneuser's gravatar image

Interesting. I lost a bit of sympathy for the professors with this: 'calling for $3 million in damages. "That was a figure our attorney suggested as a reasonable proposal for settlement. The notice of claim guidelines require that one specifies a sum of money that could be used to settle the claim," MacSwan said.' Is it just me or does $3 million seem rather excessive?

link

answered 14 Mar '12, 17:08

rseiter's gravatar image

rseiter ♦
5.9k215

It's an arbitrary number, do doubt established by the attorney, as they say. The way attorneys play games with each other (and that's exactly what it is -- a game between opposing attorneys) doesn't necessarily correspond in any particular way to what the rest of us consider excessive, fair, proper, ethical, moral, logical, or even legal. Lawyers live and operate in an alternative universe. But they demand full control once you engage them. So don't blame the professors for whatever strategy their lawyer is taking.
(16 Mar '12, 18:01) Hillbilly Hillbilly's gravatar image
Since those lawyers probably request 40% of that sum for themselves, I'm not surprised by that number.
(16 Mar '12, 20:08) rhasarub rhasarub's gravatar image
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this Question via Email

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

Q&A Editor Basics

  • to upload an image into your question or answer hit
  • to create bulleted or numbered lists hit or
  • to add a title or header hit
  • to section your text hit
  • to make a link clickable, surround it with <a> and </a> (for example, <a>www.google.com</a>)
  • basic HTML tags are also supported (for those who know a bit of HTML)
  • To insert an EQUATION you can use LaTeX. (backslash \ has to be escaped, so in your LaTeX code you have to replace \ with \\). You can see more examples and info here

powered by OSQA